Wednesday, April 11, 2007
One of the stone circles at Gobekli Tepe.
I have blogged, before, about this extraordinary place I visited last year - the world's oldest temple, in southeastern Turkey. But until now I haven't been able to tell the full story - until it was published in the Fortean Times.
That edition has now come out, so here is the proper, full-length account of my trip to "The Garden of Eden".
I'm in a rusty Turkish taxi. Ahead of me, the brown hills roll endlessly towards Syria; from my car I can see a little village, of mud houses and open drains.
It's not the most auspicious of places. Yet if reports are correct, I am heading for the most amazing archaeological dig in the world. Even more remarkable, this site may be linked to, even located within, "the Garden of Eden".
Finally my swearing cabbie scrapes us round another corner, and I see a solitary mulberry tree, stark against the cloudless sky. As we park, I notice dozens of workers and archaeologists, right across the hillside. They are hefting buckets of rock, and digging seriously at the soil. The sense of exalted archaeological effort - in hot and intense remoteness - reminds me of the opening scenes of The Exorcist.
I climb out of the car, and a genial, fifty-something German approaches. His name is Klaus Schmidt. He is the chief archaeologist here: at Gobekli Tepe.
Shaking my hand, Schmidt leads me away from the main dig. In the shade of a tented area we drink sweet Turkish tea from tulip-shaped glasses. Mopping his brow, Schmidt tells me the story of his dig.
The modern history of Gobekli Tepe (the second word is pronounced tepp-ay; the phrase means the "hill of the navel" in Turkish) begins in 1964, when a team of American archaeologists were combing this remote province of southeast Turkey. The archaeologists noted that several odd-looking hills were blanketed with thousands of broken flints, which is a sure sign of ancient human activity. Yet the US scientists drifted away, and did no excavating. Today they must feel like the publisher who rejected the first Harry Potter manuscript.
Three decades after the Americans' near miss, a local shepherd was tending his flock when he spotted something odd: a bunch of strangely-shaped stones, peeping out of the sunlit dust.
The ‘rediscovery’ of the site reached the ears of the museum curators, in the city of Sanliurfa, fifty kilometres away. The museum authorities contacted the relevant government ministry, who in turn got in touch with the German Archaeological Institute in Istanbul.
And so, in 1994, experienced archaeologist Klaus Schmidt came here, to begin excavations. ‘I was intrigued. The site already had emotional significance for the villagers,' he smiles. 'The solitary tree on the highest hill is sacred. I thought we might be onto something’.
Then Schmidt got out the cab and had a closer look. ‘Within the first minute, I knew that if I didn’t walk away immediately, I would be here the rest of my life.’
Schmidt stayed. And what he has since uncovered is quite extraordinary.
The eerie stones turned out to be the flat oblong tops of awesome megaliths. These T-shaped ochre stones loom abruptly from the exhausted earth. Most of the stones are carved with bizarre and delicate images - mainly of animals and birds. One image shows a pornographic representation of a woman. Sinuous serpents are another common motif. The stones themselves seem to represent men - some have stylised "arms", which angle down the sides of the stones.
So far, 43 stones have been dug out. They are arranged in circles from five to ten metres across. Around the circles are benches of rock, smallish niches, and walls of mud brick. The unearthed megaliths stand between one and four metres high.
There are indications that more is to come. A few years ago Schmidt and his team found a very weathered, half-quarried, T shaped stone, lying in a limestone bed, a kilometre from the main site. This enormous stone is nine metres long, and was, it seems, designed to join the other pillars at Gobekli . 'The stone is cracked, so it must have broken', Schmidt explains, 'when this happened the builders probably left it and started on another.'
All of which means there may be other stones, as yet undiscovered, that are this big. Indeed, geomagnetic surveys, of the various artificial hills at Gobekli Tepe, imply that there are at least 250 more standing stones waiting to be excavated.
So far, so remarkable. If Gobekli Tepe was simply this, it would already be a dazzling site - a Turkish Stonehenge, or a Kurdish Carnac. But Gobekli Tepe isn't just this. One unique factor puts Gobekli Tepe in the archaeological stratosphere.
Gobekli Tepe is staggeringly ancient. Carbon-dating of organic matter adhering to the megaliths show that the complex is 12,000 years old. That is to say, it was built around 10,000-9000BC. For a comparison, Stonehenge was built around 2000BC. Prior to the discovery and dating of Gobekli Tepe, the most ancient megalithic complex was thought to be in Malta - dated around 3500BC.
Gobekli Tepe is thus the oldest such site in the world, by a great margin. Gobekli Tepe is so stupefyingly old it actually predates settled human life. It is also pre-pottery. Gobekli Tepe hails from a part of human history that is unimaginably distant, right back in our hunter gatherer past.
How did "cavemen" manage to build something so ambitious? Klaus Schmidt speculates that bands of hunters would have gathered sporadically at the site, through the decades of construction. During the building season, the hunters may have lived in animal-skin tents, slaughtering the local game for sustenance. The many flint arrowheads found around Gobekli support this thesis; they also support the dating of the site.
This revelation: that hunter gatherers, early Neolithic people, could have built something like Gobekli, is world-changing. Hitherto it was presumed that agriculture necessarily preceded civilisation, that complex art, society and architecture depended on the reliable food supplies derived from farming. Gobekli Tepe shows that the old hunter-gatherer life, in this region of Turkey, was far more advanced than we ever conceived.
Nonetheless, even for the most resourceful and organised of pre-farming societies, constructing something as refined as Gobekli must have been a powerful challenge, and a serious drain on manpower. These guys must have had a very good reason to build Gobekli. What was it all for?
Schmidt thinks he knows. ‘Gobekli Tepe is not a house or a domestic building. Evidence of any domestic use is entirely lacking. No remains of settled human habitation have been found nearby. That leaves one purpose - religion. Gobekli Tepe is the oldest temple in the world. And it isn't just a temple; I think it is probably a funerary complex.'
Schmidt's thesis has supporting data. In the latest season of digging his team have found human bones, in soils that once filled the niches behind the megaliths. 'I believe the ancient hunters brought the corpses of relatives here, and installed them in the open niches by the stones. The corpses were then excarnated: picked clean by wild animals.'
There is more evidence that Gobekli had a religious purpose: the circular arrangement of the stones echoes much later Neolithic temples, like Stonehenge and Avebury. The many rock carvings on the stones also appear much more ritualistic than domestic.
Sipping his tea, Schmidt elaborates: 'So many of the carvings seem to celebrate the chase - we have found many images of prey, of boars, foxes and gazelles. Also images of ducks being hunted with nets. Gobekli Tepe was probably a site for funerals, but it was also a place to celebrate the life of the hunter, and the hunt itself.'
Our tea-glasses are empty. We leave the calm of the open tents, and return to the dust and hubbub of the dig. Looking at the circles of enigmatic stones, and their exquisite carvings of lions and boars, it is easy to believe the theory: that Gobekli Tepe is a temple dedicated to the hunting lifestyle. What is less easy to believe is the idea that this region of Turkey, these dusty brown hills all around us, once supported a large "civilisation" of hunter-gatherers. Indeed it is hard to believe that this semi-desert once supported enough animals to justify any hunting at all.
Gazing across the arid hilltops, Klaus Schmidt explains: 'It wasn't always like this. We know from remains of animals and plants that this was once a rich region, ecologically speaking. There were dozens of mammal species, green meadows and woods. The climate was wetter and lusher, but still warm. The herds of game were enormous. A paradisical place.'
His eyes are twinkling as he says this. We are approaching the extraordinary connection with the Eden story.
But before we get there, an obvious question is posed. What happened to the landscape? Why is the region now so eroded and barren, if it was once so lush and Edenic?
Schmidt picks up a knapped piece of flint from the weary earth. There are thousands of flint pieces - man-made - littering these hills. He says: ‘To build such a place as this, the hunters must have joined together, in great numbers. After they finished building, they probably congregated for worship, and for funerals. But then they found that they couldn’t feed so many people with the game. So I think they began cultivating the grasses on the hills. Einkorn wheat, a forerunner of domestic wheat, grows wild here. So they domesticated it.' Schmidt looks at the solitary mulberry tree on the hill. 'In other words, they began farming to support their religious community. But it was the farming that maybe caused their downfall.’
According to Schmidt, it seems that agriculture began here, in the province immediately surrounding Gobekli, sometime around 8000BC. (This indeed was one of the very first places in the world where men farmed). We know roughly when and where farming began, because of the archaeological evidence: domestication is a shock to the physiology of man and beast. The skeletons of people change, they temporarily grow smaller and less healthy, as the human body adapts to a protein-poorer diet, and a more arduous lifestyle. Likewise, newly domesticated animals get scrawnier - at first.
But 8000BC, it seems, was also the time when the local landscape began to alter. As the trees were chopped down, and the soil leached away, the area became arid and bare. What was once a glorious pastoral region - of forests and meadows, rich with game and wild grasses - became a toilsome place that had to be worked ever harder.
Schmidt and I descend a ladder to the floor of the dig, where the ancient dust is banked against the T-stones. Schmidt goes on:
'The really strange thing is that, in 8000BC, during the shift to agriculture, Gobekli Tepe was buried. I mean deliberately - not in a mudslide. For some reason the hunters, the ex hunters, decided to entomb the entire site in soil. The earth we are removing from the stones was put here by man himself, all these hills are artificial.'
The link is becoming irresistible. A lost paradise, a forsaken lifestyle, a terrible "mistake", even a solitary tree. Could there really be a connection between Gobekli Tepe and the Garden of Eden story?
I have more investigation to do, before I reach a conclusion. Promising Klaus that I will return in a day or so, I climb back in the cab, and head off down the dusty road.
On the way, I consult my notes. The idea that the Eden narrative in the Bible is an allegory, for the transition from hunter-gathering to farming, is not a new one. Several writers and thinkers - like Hugh Brody - have canvassed the idea in the past. What is new is the accumulation of data that locates this allegory precisely in the Gobekli Tepe region.
One strand of evidence relates to early farming. Finds in neighbouring Turkish digs show that all Eurasian agriculture might have started around here. For instance, the very first pigs were domesticated at Cayonu, ninety kilometres away. Likewise, worldwide wheat species seem to descend from einkorn wheat - first cultivated on these same brown hills.
The taxi accelerates, as the road flattens out. We are heading through cotton fields, irrigated by water from the Euphrates. On the distant horizon I can see the blue Taurus mountains. This reminds me of additional links to the Eden narrative.
In the Bible, Eden is said to be situated where four rivers descend. This has long been taken, by believers, to mean the Fertile Crescent between the rivers Tigris and Euphrates. Similarly, the Book of Genesis claims that Eden is ringed by mountains.
There are further links. Forty minutes' drive brings me to the large and vibrant Kurdish city of Sanliurfa. The place seems relatively modern, but it has, according to reports, an extraordinary lineage.
My first port of call in Sanliurfa is the local museum. A few pence gets me entrance: a small price to pay for what I am about to see.
Tucked inside the first gallery, under the stairs and hard by the fire extinguisher, is a weird, life-size, creamy-grey limestone statue of a man. This statue was exhumed in the ancient heart of Sanliurfa, when foundations were being laid for a bank.
Recent carbon dating of the Neolithic temple, wherein the statue was found, confirm that this bizarre effigy dates from 10,000-9000BC. This makes it probably the oldest life-size statue of a human ever discovered: the oldest self portrait in stone. And here it is, right by the fire extinguisher. The stare of its obsidian eyes is shockingly sad: it seems to be looking across the aeons with anguished regret, foreseeing the tragic mistakes of mankind.
Another quick car ride brings me to the site of the statue's discovery. It is a local beauty spot known as Balikli Gol, a long and limpid fishpond, surrounded by golden stoned mosques, and tea houses, even a converted Crusader church. Tourists like to feed the fat and excitable fish in the ponds. The legend is that the fish were put here by the Prophet Abraham. The locals also believe that Sanliurfa is the Ur of the first books of the Bible.
These are just legends, of course. Yet we now know - because of the strange statue in the Sanliurfa museum - that Sanliurfa is incredibly old. There has been human activity here for twelve thousand years, perhaps continuously. Is it so unlikely that the Book of Genesis would refer to this ancient region, this fons et origo of civilisation?
Not unlikely at all, because we know that some places, near Sanliurfa, are definitely mentioned in Genesis.
The next morning I take a longer cab ride, across the brown flatlands, into the desert wastes further south. The fields are being tilled by Kurdish women in their typical lavender-coloured headscarves. The women look weary from the heat. This region is so sultry people sleep outside their houses on raised metal platforms.
Eventually we reach Harran, where a ruined tower rises from the roadside. This was once the oldest Islamic University in the world. It dates from the 9th century AD. But Harran's ancestry is even nobler than that. Harran is the same Harran as is mentioned, twice, in the Book of Genesis. This is where Abraham once lived, according to the Bible.
Back in the taxi I make my final journey to Gobekli. On the way I put all the jigsaw pieces together. Taking into account the Biblical links, the history and topography of the region, the evidence of very early domestication hereabouts, and the data from the site itself, Gobekli Tepe is arguably a temple located "within the Garden of Eden".
Put it another way: the story of Eden is a folk-memory, and an allegory: and it tells us of our glorious hunter-gatherer past, in this once-fertile corner of Anatolia, before our own activities cast us into a harsher world. Gobekli Tepe celebrates and remembers a wonderful time of plenty, when we had leisure enough to learn the arts, and to cultivate a complex religion, even if we didn't know how to make pots. And then we fell into farming.
As God says to Adam: ‘cursed is the ground because of you; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life.’
Of course, all this is speculation, and very dabatable. What is unquestionable is that Gobekli Tepe is one of the greatest archaeological discoveries since the Second World War. Every day they find something new, something never seen before, something marvellous. As I am about to discover.
When my cab stops, and I step towards the dig, I sense a drama in the air. Excitement is mounting. Some Turkish workmen are uncovering a new stone relief, on a just-unearthed megalith: it shows birds, scorpions and waterlife; it is exquisitely carved, as fresh and delicate as the day it was chiselled. A bunch of us gather around to have a closer look. I suddenly realise that we are the first people to see this remarkable artwork in 10,000 years.
Klaus Schmidt nods thoughtfully at the new relief. Then he says: ‘You think that is amazing? Komm!’ He strides across the dig and points downwards. ‘We found this yesterday.’ At the foot of another megalith is a perfect sculpture of a famished animal, actually attached to the standing stone. It is like nothing anyone has ever seen before, it was carved long before the wheel was invented, and it was found yesterday.
'What is it?' I ask.
Klaus Schmidt shakes his head.
'Maybe it is a crocodile, or maybe a cat. But the claws, the paws, they look perhaps like a wolf.'
We are done. My heart is actually pounding. Together, Klaus Schmidt and I retreat to the tents for a final cup of tea. We discuss the Eden idea. He is adamant that it is just a theory, albeit a very intriguing one. As he says: 'Gobekli Tepe is important enough without any speculations. '
I have just one question left. Why did the hunter gatherers of Gobekli deliberately entomb the complex? It seems a bizarre act, as well as a vastly laborious one. Again Klaus Schmidt shrugs.
'We don't know.'
Sometimes those three simple words can be the most exciting of all.
The Goddess and the Bull, Catalhoyuk: An Archaeological Journey to the Dawn of Civilisation, by Michael Batler
The Other Side of Eden, by Hugh Brody
After The Ice: A Global Human History 50,000-20,000BC by Steven Mithen
Sie Bauten Die Ersten Temple ("You Built The First Temple"), by Klaus Schmidt
Also visit: www.dainst.org, the website of the German Archaeological Institute, for updates on the Gobekli Tepe dig itself.
The "Fishpool of Abraham" - otherwise known as Bolikli Gol - in Sanliurfa.
The new rockfrieze at Gobekli Tepe.
The single mulberry tree.
The "reptile" recently uncovered at the temple.
The stones of Gobekli Tepe.
The Kurdish shepherd who rediscovered Gobekli.
The Bolikli Gol statue - perhaps the oldest lifesize human image in the world.
Klaus Schmidt, and one of the carvings at Gobekli Tepe.
Posted by sean at 9:09 am
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
In a desperate bid to illustrate this piece of mine (that originally appeared in thefirstpost last week) I have resorted to the above image of a Hussar. It's a picture of the sort of soldier who might have fought in The War of Jenkins' Ear. OK, bit gay, I know. But still - "The War of Jenkins' Ear"? You have to admit that's a funky name for a war. Unlike "The War of the Northern Peace Shield".
Read on for an explanation.
What Do You Call A War?
It seems an arcane, peculiar and even pointless argument. But it is vexing the Israeli government mightily.
What should be the official name for last year's conflict between the Jewish state and Hezbollah, in south Lebanon? So important is the debate, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has appointed a government commission, which this week reached a conclusion.
For some Israelis, simply calling it a 'war' is difficult. Because if the Israelis call it a war, they are admitting that Hezbollah somehow represents the Lebanese state - as only sovereign states can, theoretically, fight wars.
Yet this argument hasn't worked. Because the brutal facts don't fit. Thousands died in last summer's hostilities, tens of thousands were made homeless, millions took shelter from the ceaseless bullets, shells, bombs, and missiles. It was a war.
Therefore, like all wars, it must be named. And this is where the argument gets heated. History is written by the victors, and some in Israel would like to win the war after the event - or at least spin the conflict favourably - by giving it a pointed title.
One proposal was the 'War of the Hostages'. This would underline the angry Israeli perception: that the conflict was kicked off by Hezbollah's kidnapping of an Israeli soldier (whose fate is still unknown).
Yet the idea didn't appeal to the commission. Similarly unpopular was another suggestion: the 'War of the Northern Peace Shield'. Perhaps the desperate clumsiness of the phrase was a problem here. The official title for the 1992 war with Lebanon was the 'War of the Peace of the Galilee'. And that never caught on, either.
In the end, the commission has bowed to simple logic. Last summer's fighting will henceforth be known as the 'Second Lebanon War'. Israeli officials strenuously deny that this name, in itself, pre-supposes more Lebanese wars to come.
Posted by sean at 10:13 am